Young Australians are facing fierce and increasing competition from
foreign-born graduates for a declining number of jobs, according to a
new report.
The report says it is the Australians who are losing out, given that the
100,000 new jobs created since 2011 have been almost all taken up by
migrants, many of whom are foreign students who graduated from
Australian universities and have stayed on.
The study highlights the problems faced by Western countries – that have
attracted high migrant numbers from Asia – when unemployment rates
begin to rise.
The report says the slowdown in employment growth in Australia is starting to bite on the job situation for the local-born.
This effect is exacerbated by the federal government’s immigration
policies to encourage large numbers of migrants into the country, since
they have succeeded in taking up all of the net number of new jobs
created in Australia over the past two years.
“This is occurring at a time when the potential workforce among young
Australians continues to grow. The result is increasing unemployment, a
declining level of labour force participation and, in less-skilled,
entry-level occupations, ferocious competition for available jobs,” the
report says.
Prepared by Dr Bob Birrell and Dr Ernest Healy of Monash University’s
centre for population and urban research in Melbourne, the report says
there is a strong case for the government to re-evaluate its migration
policy.
“At present, the government appears to be operating on two assumptions:
the first that employment growth will continue at pre-2011 rates and the
second that migrants are filling important skill vacancies in the
workforce.
“The recent slowdown in employment manifestly falsifies the first
assumption and the poor record of recently arrived degree-qualified
migrants from non-English-speaking backgrounds in gaining professional
and managerial positions belies the second.”
The report says the federal government is wrong in claiming that its
migration programme is importing “a highly educated addition to the
nation’s skilled workforce” to help fill skill vacancies.
In a study of more than 200,000 immigrants who arrived in Australia
since 2011 and their workforce participation, Birrell and Healy found
that most graduates from non-English-speaking countries were employed in
occupations in sub-professional fields, mainly in community and
personal service, and clerical and administrative fields.
The Monash researchers looked at the largest group of recently arrived
skilled migrants, which included significant numbers of overseas
students who graduated from Australian universities. They say that if
the migrants held skills needed in Australia, this should show up in a
strong record of employment in managerial and professional positions.
This group is of particular interest because of the government’s aim to
boost the proportion of degree-qualified 25- to 34-year-old Australian
residents to 40% by 2025.
Birrell and Healy say the government “has been in celebration mode on
this issue recently” because it appears its policies of opening up
opportunities for university training appear to be working, with the
proportion rising from 31.8% in 2008 to 36.8% in 2012.
“In reality, this surge in the proportion of those aged 25 to 34 with
degrees has little to do with recent increases in university enrolment
levels.
“These will have an impact on the share of the 25- to 34-year-old cohort
with degrees over the next decade whereas the recent rise is
attributable to migration [because] 72% of the growth between 2006 and
2011 were overseas-born and include a mixture of persons who entered
Australia with degrees, and those who trained here as overseas students
and have stayed on either as permanent or temporary residents.”
The study found that nearly one in three degree-holding migrants from
non-English-speaking backgrounds had credentials in management and
commerce – a direct result of the high proportion of overseas students
who completed accounting courses in Australia and then sought to stay
on.
Yet 31% of this group were unemployed compared with 9% of
Australian-born graduates and 12% of those from mainly English-speaking
countries.
“The bottom line [for the non-English-backgrounders] is that as well as
the 31% not employed, only 4% of the total occupied managerial positions
and just 26% held professional positions.
“By comparison, 58% of the Australian-born and 53% of those recently
arrived from English-speaking countries with degree qualifications
reported being employed in professional occupations.”
The report says that more than 672,000 Australians now need to rely on
unemployment benefits – up by nearly 56,000 between November 2011 and
November 2012 – and that this should be “ringing alarm bells in policy
circles”.
Local analysis of youth unemployment also shows very high levels in
lower-income areas of Melbourne’s north and west, in Sydney’s western
suburbs, in parts of Adelaide and in Queensland. Youth unemployment in
northern Adelaide was reported to be as high as 42% – a consequence of
significant competition for low-skilled jobs advertised in the northern
suburbs.
“Young people without post-school credentials face serious problems in
obtaining work in the current labour market. Most have to begin their
working life in relatively low-skilled, entry-level jobs, such as in the
hospitality and retail areas,” Birrell and Healy write.
“Yet these are the very industries that have been hardest hit in the
recent slowdown in employment growth [and] are also the industries in
which temporary migrants are most likely to seek employment.”
0 Comments